Jai Parasram’s article on Indian Arrival Day was a well written and an adequate response to critics of the annual Indian Arrival commemoration in Trinidad and other parts of the Caribbean and world (Sunday Guardian, May 28, 2017, p 13 Indian Arrival Day Celebrates Spirit of Survival.)
A lot of discussion had taken place in the past on the issue of Indian Arrival Day as worthy of commemoration in and out of Parliament, and one would have thought that the issue was a settled one. That Mr Parasram had to address lingering concerns has shown otherwise.
Comments like “Indian Arrival...celebrates the beginning of our slavery sentence,” or “We would celebrate the beginning of bondage,” are some points which were made by critics in the 1980s against Indian Arrival Day, especially when activists and the Indian community began to call for a national public holiday in recognition of the occasion.
A small group of activists from Curepe called The Indian Reform and Revival Association (IRRA), began the commemoration and publicised the need for this by the Centennial Celebration of May 1945. These very issues were considered then.
The decision of mark the Centennial of Indian Arrival to Trinidad was arrived at in a most democratic manner by a cross-section of the Indian community. The Indian monthly journal, The Observer, An Organ of Indian Opinion, edited by SM Rameshwar, reported on the all-day conference held in San Fernando on Sunday March 4, 1945. The “large crowd” of delegates came from Princes Town, San Juan, Siparia, Penal, Port-of-Spain and other districts, all being representatives of Indian organisations. The report stated that “Indians of Trinidad, by resolution passed at a conference, have decided to celebrate the 100 years of successful settlement in the Colony. The conference felt that the progress made in the intervening century is worthy of record and recognition.”
During the conference “it was explained by various speakers that it was not intended to celebrate the conditions of our coming but the progress the Indian community had undoubtedly made over a period of 100 years.”
SM Rameshwar in the editorial wrote that “what we are to celebrate is not the fact that our forefathers came here under a system of indenture; we celebrate 100 years of successful settlement during which we, as a community, have made creditable strides in every walk of life, thereby contributing richly to the progress of the colony as a whole.” Indian Arrival Day was an occasion “to pay high tribute to our ancestors” and that “no intelligent Indian in the colony is unaware of the difficulties which our forefathers face and heroically surmounted.” The occasion should be regarded as “a time of stock-taking.” Further, “we shall have forever to thank our pioneering ancestors for remaining faithful repositories of the culture and traditions which they brought,” thus it is a celebration of cultural continuity.
There was Indian economic consciousness permeating the occasion of the Centenary Celebrations in 1945–the Indian community had made progress commenced by our Indian indentured ancestors and continued by their descendants, and that this progress was due to self-effort, by hard work and a disciplined life-style.
There was no scapegoating of anyone, of the system of indenture, the planters and plantations, of colonialism, of the British et al.
The few remaining critics of Indian Arrival Day should be aware of this history and the positions of Indians in 1945, positions which apply today. Jai Parasram is probably unaware of the details of this history but, after 72 years, he has faithfully recorded the thinking, the “mind” of Indians in 1945 in answer to critics.
Kamal Persad
The Indian Review Committee
Carapichaima
